Quick inquiry about scheduled future status change

Squiz Matrix Support
1

Hi all,




I am not sure if this is possible or not, but just inquiring about it.



Currently for example when a user goes and edit any type of assets, for example in a day twice and then they click on the detail screen of that asset there are two up for review under the heading called scheduled future status changes (no problems there )



First one is the old one, and the second one is the latest one.



What I am getting at is that is there no way of only displaying the current instead of the old one automatically. The only way to remove the old one is if a user has system administrator or root user privilege, else a backend user can’t delete this manually.



Thank you B)

2

Why are there 2? Is that caused by a trigger or something?

3

[quote]Why are there 2? Is that caused by a trigger or something?
[right][post=“14845”]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]



well these are the triggers we got.


  1. Clear cache - UOM (files)
  2. Clear Cache - UOM (pages)
  3. Set Review Date (6Months) (files)
  4. Set Review Date (6Months) (pages)





    I have attached a image to illustrate the problem . Thank you :rolleyes:
    scheduledfuture.JPG (12.6 KB)
4

What you need are two things.


First, to make sure those triggers only fire on status change to live, rather than when an asset is updated. I suspect they probably are as that is the most common setup, but worth checking.



The other thing you need is 3.12. There is a new trigger action that you could add that would allow you to delete the existing future status job before adding the new one.



There is no way to clean this up right now other than manually.

5

[quote]What you need are two things.


First, to make sure those triggers only fire on status change to live, rather than when an asset is updated. I suspect they probably are as that is the most common setup, but worth checking.



The other thing you need is 3.12. There is a new trigger action that you could add that would allow you to delete the existing future status job before adding the new one.



There is no way to clean this up right now other than manually.

[right][post=“14849”]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]



Thank you very much Greg :rolleyes: